This new breakout board from Sparkfun has a 1-millimeter resolution and around +/-5mm accuracy – which is good if you want to use the sensor to detect objects or create maps.
The sensor emits a class 1 IR laser (940 nm) which theoretically is safe even for long-term intentionally viewing.
The I2C interface can be used with both a microcontroller (Arduino) or a single board computer (Raspberry Pi). If you use Arduino, you have the Sparkfun VL53L1X Arduino library (less work and more time for you).
What I do not like is the operating voltage which should be between 2.6V and 3.5V. If I want to power it directly from Arduino or Raspberry Pi is ok. Otherwise, I need a 3.3V power supply module or a 5V to 3.3V level shifter.
Theoretically, a ToF module can be used outside with the risk of lower performance. Unfortunately, Sparkfun says nothing about using this sensor outside.
I have this robotic arm with 6-axis and very cheap servo motors. When I bought it, I did not think I would use it to who knows what applications. I buy it because is cheap and I can control it with an Arduino Mega and ROS.
The problem is that I want to build a robotic arm capable to identify objects (like an apple or a pear), to pick the fruit from a tree, and put it in a basket near the robotic arm. For these operations, I need an arm with a relatively solid structure and some powerful servo motors. In conclusion, the kit I have is not helping me.
The second plan is to buy a ROS ready robotic arm with servo motors that can handle a weight around 200 grams. Because it is a personal project with a limited budget (maximum $ 1000), I searched for and found the following three robotic arms that would fit my project.
The first option is a PhantomX robotic arm with 4 degree-of-freedom and a gripper with a rated holding strength of up to 500g, while the wrist itself can lift up to 250g horizontally.
The second option is also a PhantomX arm that can handle the same weight as the first one. But it comes in addition with 5 degrees of freedom, a greater range of action and up to 300 degrees of motion.
The third option is the most expensive and I may have the surprise not to receive it in the next few months when I need it. It’s about Niryo One. For now, the arm can only be pre-ordered. The combination of Raspberry Pi, Arduino, ROS, parts that can be printed with a 3D printer – attracts me a lot.
YDLIDAR F4 and G4 are two LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) sensors for environmental scanning, SLAM application… in other words, the sensors are designed for use in robot navigation.
The price range is $259.00 for F4 and $419.00 for G4. Both sensors are in direct competition with RPLidar A1M8(~$219.00) or RPLIDAR A2M6 (~$600.00).
I scan a little bit the specifications to see what is good and bad with these sensors: the good
12m scanning range (F4) and 16m scanning range(G4) – enough for autonomous robots in agriculture or construction fields;
both sensors include a safe low power infrared transmitter conforms to the FDA safety standard of Class 1 laser. This means that is safe to work with these sensors, the human eye is not affected;
only F4 uses a USB connection with a computer;
only F4 has complete drivers, supporting Windows, Android, ROS, and Linux system;
I try to find more information about who is the manufacturer. Their site is not completed and some links don’t work. The link to the Contact page will redirect you to something that can be called “About us”, while “About ydlidar” redirect to a 404 page. This could be interpreted as small details, but one question came into my mind – how this manufacturer will provide support and documentation for these sensors if they can not solve their own site problems?
Now I build a 4WD outdoor robot and I was still thinking how to mount the Maxbotix’s ultrasonic sensors so that I don’t have problems with the dust and any other dirty things. Luckily, I discovered this waterproof sensor.
But there are some negative aspects. The sensor is blind for the first 25 centimeters and in many cases I have to deal with obstacles that may appear right in front of the robot (the wind pushes the tree branch in front of the robot).
As a positive side, the sensor is Arduino compatible and is working with 5V. The maximum range of the sensor is 4.5m, but some users seem to have some issue with the maximum distance. For me, a range of maximum 2 meters is much more than I would need. So, I should not worry about the maxim range.
Other important specifications:
it detects an obstacle at an angle less than 50 degrees;
use your smartphone to give your robot senses, so it can see where it’s going. Almost any smartphone – even a $30 device – is like a box with sensors. All these sensors can be used for a robot. A sensor like a camera to capture images, the accelerometer and gyro to drive the robot, and the pressure and proximity sensors for any other application.
Husarion, the company behind CORE2, has been developing an Android application that makes available the smartphone sensor readings through a ROS node.
The application is called hNode and creates a network between the smartphone, the robot, a laptop with ROS and the Husarion cloud.
I’m not sure, but to work in this way, most probably the robot should use the CORE2-ROS (running ROS) controller. More details here.
I’ll start the description of the chassis from the wheels because I know what I’m talking about. I bought four similar wheels with non-inflatable rubber tire from eBay and I mounted them on a DIY mobile robot. The robot has a weight of around 10Kg (yes, two 12V sealed acid batteries). The wheels behaved quite well on uneven concrete. I did not get to test them on the grass because one of my motor axes has been broken.
Well, in other words, if the weight of the robot will not exceed 5-6 Kg, these wheels work very well on uneven concrete and most probably on grass. If you exceed this weight, when you turn around your robot, the rubber tire gives signs that would get off the rim.
The DC 12V motors are powerful enough to push the platform on almost any terrain. Without electronics and batteries, the platform weight around 2,2Kg. It is a big weight, but it must be taken into account that the chassis is made of iron.
Power Supply Battery: 3.7v 18650*3 (NOT included)
Motor Voltage: DC 12V
Load current: 0.68A
Locked rotor current: 2.19A
Motor Speed: 300±10% (no-load) 245±10% (load)
Rated moment: 1.8kg.cm
Chassis Material: Iron
Motor size: 3.7*5.8cm/ 1.4*2.2inch
Output shaft size: 0.6*1.5cm
Wheel size: Dia :12.6cm/ 4.9inch width:5.9cm/2.3inch
Wheel Material: Rubber+plastic
Product Size: 27*27*12cm/ 10.6*10.6*4.7inch
Package Size: 38.5*29*6.5cm / 15.1*11.4*2.5inch
Gross Weight: 2255g/4.9 lb
The price of the chassis is $99.99 and not include the controller like Arduino or Raspberry Pi, the motor controller and the batteries.
If you don’t have plans to build an outdoor chassis from scratch, this metal chassis could be a solution for your project.
This board is not designed with robotics in mind, but it could be helpful in some applications.
It has an ARM processor, Android OS, and Cellular connectivity. In other words, the board can run ROS and stay connected to the 4G Internet via nano-SIM. For most of us who build adventurous robots with an Internet connection, Orange Pi 4G-IOT can replace the Raspberry Pi board and a 4G USB dongle.
Also, the price is very attractive. On Aliexpress the board price is $45.00 – the price does not include the shipping costs.
I know that it’s about marketing, but about the fact that the board is open-source, I still do not understand how it would help me integrate it more easily into my projects or develop applications in another niche.
Regarding the features, the board supports sensors like accelerometer, fingerprint identification for security, IR control, camera, and touchscreen display.
Orange Pi 4G-IoT has a built-in Emmc memory with a capacity of 8GB. The memory space is enough to run the OS and some code, but it makes me nervous when I think that the board was designed for games and multimedia.
The full list of specifications:
Orange Pi 4G-IoT specifications:
SoC – Mediatek MT6737 quad-core Cortex A53 processor @ 1.1/1.3 GHz with Arm Mali-T720MP1 GPU
System Memory – 1GB DDR3
Storage – 8GB eMMC flash + micro SD slot
Video Output – HDMI, LCD display interface with touch panel support
Audio – 3.5mm earphone jack, built-in microphone
nano SIM card slot
“GSM” antenna + diversity antenna
2G – GSM @ 850/900/1800/1900 MHz
WCDMA – B1/B2/B4/B5/B8
LTE Cat 4
FDD-LTE – B1/B2/B3/B4/B7/B107/B20
TDD-LTE – B38/40/41B
Connectivity – WiFi, Bluetooth, FM, and GPS with antenna
Camera – 25-pin ZIF connector for 13MP camera
USB – 3x USB host ports, 1x micro USB port (only for flashing firmware)
Time-of-Flight principle (ToF) is a method for measuring the distance between a sensor and an object, based on the time difference between the emission of a signal and its return to the sensor, after being reflected by an object.
If you read the above principle, most probably you remember it from the ultrasonic sensors.
Back to the Broadcom’s sensor, it uses the ToF principle to measure the distance and motion of objects. If an ultrasonic sensor uses ultrasounds to measure the distance and detect the motion of an object, the AFBR-S50 sensor uses optics. The sensor uses up to 3000 frames per second with up to 16 illuminated pixels for detection and measurements.
According to the specifications, the sensor can be used outside. We know that the optical sensors don’t have a good return in strong sunlight. This one seems to have on white, black, colored and metallic reflective surfaces.
Other important specifications:
measure distances up to 10m for a black target. No data about other targets;
the accuracy of < 1 percent (I guess that this is only for the black target!?);
the voltage supply is 5V;
the data is transferred via a digital SPI interface;
the sensor supports up to 3000 frames per second;
The area of applications for the AFBR-S50 sensor is especially robotics and automation.